You see all these articles and downloads and PNGs floating around about Bottega Veneta logos. I mean, they’re EVERYWHERE. Bottega Veneta this, Bottega Veneta that. Free logos, design your own, download and share! It’s a total brand explosion!
And then you get this idea of “Logo-Free Bottega Veneta Jewelry.” Like, what even *is* that? Isn’t the whole point of Bottega Veneta (well, partly, anyway) that you *know* it’s Bottega Veneta? I mean, the woven leather, the Intrecciato thingy… that’s kinda their signature, y’know? It’s subtly loud, if that makes sense.
So, like, are we talking about jewelry that’s *supposed* to look like Bottega Veneta but *isn’t*? Or is it legitimately Bottega Veneta, but without any visible branding? Because if it’s the first one, that just sounds like a knockoff, right? Like, the kind of thing you’d find in some sketchy corner of the internet (no offense to the sketchy corners of the internet, you guys provide a vital service!).
And if it’s the *actual* Bottega Veneta, but without the logo… well, that’s kinda interesting, I guess. Maybe they’re going for a more minimalist vibe? Or maybe it’s for people who have the money to buy Bottega Veneta but don’t want to be all flashy about it? Like a “I’m rich, but I’m subtle” kind of thing. Which, honestly, is a whole vibe in itself.
But honestly? I’m kinda confused. Is it a trend? Is it a way to trick people? Is it just a clever marketing ploy to get people talking about Bottega Veneta even MORE (which, if so, well played)?
I mean, look at all the stuff online about the logos! Free vectors! PNGs! Downloads! Everyone’s obsessed with the BRAND, the visual identity. So why would they then go and strip that away from their jewelry? It seems counterintuitive, right?
Maybe, and this is just a thought, maybe it’s all about the craftsmanship. Maybe they want the focus to be on the actual artistry of the jewelry, the materials, the design itself, rather than just the name attached to it. Which, okay, I can respect that. Quality over everything, y’know?
